Dialogue

Dialogue

Our Goals

At NIMD, we believe that democracy starts with dialogue. We know from experience that when different political groups come together in dialogue – with each other, with civil society, or with their population in general – a country has a much greater chance of implementing reform, forging lasting peace, and cultivating a thriving inclusive democracy.

NIMD itself is the outcome of dialogue and cooperation between Dutch political parties from across the ideological spectrum, and all our programming and interventions are rooted in this belief in impartiality and working together for the common good.

 

Through our dialogue initiatives, we aim to build trust, collaboration and consensus between political parties and other political actors, forming the foundation of a respectful democratic culture.

At a time when inequality is growing and trust in state institutions is strained, building links between politicians and the people they represent is also a key goal of our dialogue work.

Our signature dialogue interventions can:

  • Help prevent and resolve conflict, by creating safe spaces for facilitated dialogue outside of confrontational or politically-charged environments
  • Combat polarization, by bringing people together across ideological divides and encouraging them to recognize their commonalities
  • Lead to new laws, regulations, and policy changes, through long-term collaboration and consensus building
  • Further democratic reform, by cultivating inclusive spaces where voices from across society can be heard on an equal footing

While there are challenges ahead as we see a trend towards shrinking democratic space, more single party dominance, and a weakening of opposition forces, our flexibility and depth of experience gives us room to evolve and innovate in rapidly-changing political landscapes.

Our Approach

We have extensive experience in creating and supporting political dialogue around the world, where we help cultivate safe spaces for political actors to work together in a respectful and inclusive environment.

This can take different forms. While our dialogue work originally targeted political parties and government actors, our approach has broadened in response to changing political circumstances, and we now work to bring together politicians and civil society groups too. This means we can continue to have an impact at all levels of society.

A dialogue intervention is also always responsive to the specific needs and goals of the people we work with, and sensitive to political dynamics on the ground: a political dialogue can be a regular formal meeting involving senior politicians or a social event bringing together people from different sectors of society in an informal setting.

What makes our political dialogue approach unique is our commitment to impartiality: we give everyone a seat at the table, allowing us to build trust across political divides.

Five signature dialogue interventions

We have five signature dialogue interventions, which we deploy after extensive analysis and consultation with our target groups:

  • Political Party Dialogue: Our traditional dialogue intervention, in which NIMD or its partners facilitate a safe space for dialogue between representatives of political parties. These can be platforms with a regular commitment aimed at building trust and collaboration over the long term, or a short-term intervention, focussed on producing results in one particular issue, theme, or piece of legislation.
  • Political Actor Dialogue: Similar in approach to our Political Party Dialogue, but broadened to include other people involved in politics. These include parliamentarians, opposition parties not yet in parliament, government officials, caucuses, or local government figures.
  • Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue: Going beyond people directly involved in the political process to gather diverse groups in society that have a stake in the political process. These can include unions, advocacy groups, protest movements, and businesses. Multi-stakeholder Dialogues are usually convened with a specific issue, goal or purpose in mind and take place over a designated time frame.
  • Informal Dialogue: Not all settings require a formal and structured dialogue platform with set parameters. For those occasions, NIMD or its partners can facilitate informal gatherings in which political or civic actors can exchange ideas and build trust in a convivial and non-confrontational environment. There are no formal commitments, with the main goal being trust building to lay the groundwork for future collaboration.
  • Dialogue Assistance: In cases where a government or other (state or civic) actors have set up their own dialogue initiative, NIMD is able to provide technical, logistical, and thematic support and expertise to help in the success of the initiative.

Dialogue in fragile and conflict-affected settings

When a country is tackling security issues, the political environment can be extremely polarized due to a lack of trust between political actors. NIMD’s strategies on political party dialogue are highly valued in these settings, when trust-building processes demand knowledge of the institutional context and the actors involved, combined with tactful diplomacy and high-end dialogue facilitation skills.

Based on our track record and multiple years of experience in political dialogue at the highest levels, NIMD and its network of international facilitation experts and trusted local partners facilitate dialogue between opposing sides, investing in building political trust and forging lasting peace.

Meet The Team

Violet Benneker
Learning and Innovation Advisor

Violet Benneker leads NIMD's approach on Dialogue. She combines her practical experience on political dialogue with theoretical expertise. She holds a PhD from Leiden University on political dialogue about contested human rights in the Middle East.

Nic van der Jagt
Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning Advisor

Nic van der Jagt contributes his expertise on project monitoring and evaluation to the Dialogue team, supporting the evaluation and analysis of NIMD’s signature dialogue interventions.